|
I M A G E S Y S T E M
BY Mia Taylor
What interests me is not just the complete picture, but
a minute detail or a particular interaction which has to do with
how an individual sees the world. Knowing what happened in the
past and then projecting the future, you suspend yourself in that
moment of time.
Hermann Lederles work is not easy to categorize. Encompassing
a variety of media, styles and scales, it somehow manages to maintain
an ineffable balance. The influence of Clemente can be felt in
some of the earlier expressionist works and recent works on paper,
while the Pixel series suggests a kind of Cubism for
the digital age.
His work as a filmmaker cross-pollinates in subtle, oblique ways.
The idea of pixel paintings came to him when working with digital
images. It was a discovery. We may have been seeing this
way unconsciously since human beings had eyes, but now that we
know we can zoom in on something, and then zoom out and see the
whole picture, it becomes an awareness we can use to appreciate
the pixilated version. Kind of like a primal, pre-conscious experience
that relates to the era of technology.
Some of the larger canvases have a vital, explosive energy --
the large pixels radiating outward rhythmically, like a waltz,
suggest a reserved spontaneity. At the center there is calm, control,
and powerful emotion. They can be puzzle-like, with a trompe-loeuil
quality. Figures or shapes disguised within the painting are not
at first apparent, but once seen cannot be unseen. Figures float
to the surface and then sink back.
The process for his works on canvas involves a series of intricate
layers, often using gold leaf, and oil paint incorporated with
wax. There are, what he calls, three layer states: the conceptual
starting point, the emotional, and then the unifying stage. The
wax medium renders the paint transparent, allowing him to paint
layer upon layer.
It starts with a concept, perhaps ten canvases on each of which
he paints a face. Lederle might have a gold background in mind,
or a pixel pattern. They become the studies for a series. Then
he goes back and looks at each one closely, waiting for something
to speak to him, maybe a line or a nascent emotion. He singles
out one and applies an emotional state onto it. At this point,
unconcerned with technique, he works quickly and instinctively,
superimposing a snapshot of what the painting will
become. In this way each work is endowed with its unique purpose.
It is at this stage that the titles come to him. The title
of a painting creates a bridge to the audience, a portal out into
the world.
Then comes the third phase, a return to technique, when the painting
is unified stylistically. Lederle adjusts paint quality, line,
and color. The emotion is ultimately painted over. The final effect
is harmonious because of the initial grid-like foundation, which
provides a balanced substructure.
His image system includes fish, birds, and human faces. What
I like about the fish is that you have an oval, almost like a
lip or an eye, and you repeat it, to create a figure, or you can
leave it as a fish. I use it as a building block. He likes
to express body language through the upper torso. When you
observe how people fold their hands or arms, or how close they
keep them to their body, it tells you a lot about their mood,
expression, what theyre trying to be.
Although his earliest use of gold leaf was in a series of small
paintings he called Icons, one does not get a sense
of reverence from his use of the precious metal. In fact, it doesnt
feel precious. The gold is treated democratically,
with the same value as any other color in the palate.
The effect of the oil paint on gold is, however, dramatic. The
painting shifts and transforms depending on the direction of the
light in the environment. Indirect light brings the gold to the
foreground and the painted imagery becomes silhouetted as if backlit,
while in direct light the gold recedes, and the details of the
figure emerge with more prominence, as if the light is inverting
the painting as a whole. Similar to pentimento where a painting
has been painted over, the light plays upon the surface revealing,
in subtle shifts, what lies beneath.
Nor are the figures depicted necessarily heroic, but they often
have a self-contained grace, an innate contentment with the state
in which they find themselves. To me, when youre happy
with your way of being, youve fulfilled the purpose of life.
Real heroism is not something one applies externally. For
instance, in the painting Clone the figure may at
first appear trapped within a circle, yet upon further contemplation,
there is a lack of tension in the way the figure holds its arms
and head which suggests ease, and an almost yoga-like tranquility.
Lederle often hides small figures, sometimes even miniature self-portraits,
within the larger works. It provides a history, a timeline. He
builds the painting up, from the very first stroke to the very
last, while leaving behind evidence of each previous stage so
that it is possible to see how the painting has evolved. Each
painting encompasses a span of time, intimating a gradual unfolding,
the antithesis of a photograph which captures an instant. For
example, the painting entitled Voyage has two oval
shapes connected in the center, a sort of polygon. If those
two shapes traveled to meet, through the voyage and meeting, they
completed their expression in a third embodiment. Upon closer
scrutiny, a face can be discovered within.
The later body of work may have become less revealing of
my inner self, and perhaps it is a reflection of the world today.
The technique has become central to the process and the final
result. However I still like spontaneous and arbitrary expressions.
One thinks of oneself as planning ones future, yet it appears
to me that it is very open ended, a reaction to influences rather
than a premeditated structure.
August 2003
|